Samsung Galaxy Buds overview: imperfectly acceptable

Once I was in highschool, purchasing for new earphones with a single £20 notice as my price range, I used to dream of earbuds with out the wire. It wasn’t a sophisticated fantasy, simply my extremely fundamental Sony buds sans fil, because the French would put it. It took a decade and a half, however in 2016, candidates just like the Bragi Sprint and Apple’s AirPods began surfacing, every of them embodying some form of bodily compromise to accommodate a battery, speaker, and wi-fi radio into the identical tiny enclosure. The wait saved going all the way in which till final month when Samsung unveiled its Galaxy Buds alongside the Galaxy S10 and Galaxy Fold reveal.

My dream earphones had arrived.

The Galaxy Buds are probably the most forgettable true wi-fi earbuds I’ve but tried. I put them in, they usually’re so gentle that I can neglect I’m carrying them. That can be mentioned of the AirPods, besides any close by reflective floor will remind me of their presence on my head. Samsung’s Buds are as slimmed down and discreet as any earphones of this sort. Must you like them to be shouty, Samsung additionally presents them in a canary yellow that matches the Galaxy S10E. That bodily minimalism extends to the Galaxy Buds case, which is the smallest I’ve come throughout outdoors of the floss container that Apple homes the AirPods in.

As if all of that good things wasn’t sufficient, Samsung additionally endows the Galaxy Buds with wi-fi charging and costs them at $129.99, undercutting the AirPods. Anybody preordering a Galaxy S10 or Galaxy Fold machine will get a pair without cost. Properly, it seems that, in truth, the attractive first impression that these earbuds make isn’t sufficient. These are simply Samsung’s greatest true wi-fi earphones, however they endure from a couple of too many engineering missteps to be thought of a critical contender.


Verge Rating

Good Stuff

  • Mild, discreet, comfy design
  • Legit six-hour battery life
  • Tiny case with wi-fi charging
  • Higher sound isolation than Apple’s AirPods

Dangerous Stuff

  • Bass-shy sound doesn’t rise above common
  • Flaky Bluetooth connectivity
  • Poor microphone efficiency

The Galaxy Buds are able to being two very totally different merchandise. Get them as a freebie together with your Samsung telephone, and also you’ll be delighted. They’ll carry out to one of the best of their skills, they’ll offer you AirPod-like on the spot pairing, they usually gained’t have value you an additional penny. However strive utilizing them with one other Android telephone, as I did, or with an iPhone, and also you’ll be much less enthused. It’s a bizarre reversal of conventional roles between Apple and Samsung: the AirPods keep an impressive, hassle-free connection it doesn’t matter what telephone I hook them as much as, whereas the Galaxy Buds are finicky and work greatest with Samsung {hardware}.

In my testing, I attempted utilizing the Galaxy Buds with a Pixel three XL, and that pairing rapidly devolved right into a nightmare. I used to be assaulted with a barrage of connection drop-offs and disconnects whereas casually strolling down the road with the telephone in my pocket. No different pair of wi-fi headphones has given me this a lot of a headache, however Google’s had its personal woes with Bluetooth up to now, so let’s name that an unlucky mixture.

Issues enhance when I’ve the Galaxy Buds hooked as much as my MacBook Professional, however I nonetheless get an irritatingly frequent blip within the connection between the 2 Buds. It’s only a half-second of solely having one bud enjoying, however even small foibles like that develop into large annoyances over the course of hours of listening. My colleagues Dan Seifert and Dieter Bohn have additionally skilled this latter sort of connection flakiness on different units of Buds, together with when they’re related to a shiny new Galaxy S10.

Regardless of the machine related to the Galaxy Buds, they exhibit unimpressive connection vary and stability. That is disappointing in gentle of how a lot work Samsung has put into the matter, having developed its personal scalable codec for audio transmission. Operating on a Broadcom chip, the Galaxy Buds lack help for Qualcomm’s AptX or AptX HD, and there’s no LDAC to be discovered right here, both. Apple’s AAC is supported, however that doesn’t assist the Galaxy Buds sustain with video on an iPhone: there’s an unsightly and pervasive lag. That lag is much less obvious on the Google Pixel and completely absent when watching something on a Samsung machine.

Given these downsides, is there something to salvage the Galaxy Buds for an individual not already within the Samsung ecosystem? Properly, there stay benefits to those earbuds that anybody can get pleasure from. The consolation of the Galaxy Buds is seemingly eternal, their contact controls are fast and responsive, they usually provide one of the best combo of sound isolation and undemanding match I’ve but encountered amongst true wi-fi buds. With the AirPods, Apple selected to make straightforward match a precedence, shedding sound isolation, whereas most different firms swing the opposite approach, accepting imperfect consolation because the trade-off for superior noise isolation.

Samsung additionally does higher than I anticipated on the sound entrance. Although I’m damning with faint reward right here as a result of I anticipated the sound to be a deal-breaking catastrophe, the “sound by AKG” branding on the case of those earphones appears to be for actual. I positively get pleasure from listening to music on the Galaxy Buds — once they can preserve it enjoying with out a wi-fi fault.

The one substantial weak point to the sound is a detectable scarcity of bass that makes music sound like a puddle: splashy and shallow. It’s not in any approach an offensive sound signature, nevertheless it’s removed from the thick, satisfying rumble of one thing just like the Jabra Elite 65t or the Audio-Technica SPORT7TW. I’d say Samsung’s sound is appropriate, pushing on the higher limits of common.

Battery life is a power for the Galaxy Buds, which marks a significant improve from the corporate’s first true wi-fi effort, the Gear Icon earphones that lasted a feeble 1.5 hours. I by no means listened to the Buds for the complete marketed six hours at a stretch, however extended listening classes gave me battery readouts that had been according to Samsung’s promise. Plus, the case’s seven-hour reserve tops the Buds up rapidly and refreshes the clock any time I retailer them away. This case additionally accepts wi-fi charging, whereas being as gentle and diminutive as it’s, which I think about a minor engineering miracle.

Each Samsung flagship telephone proprietor ought to have a wi-fi charger by now, and 2019 will see many others making the swap, so Galaxy Buds consumers in all probability gained’t want to purchase additional gear only for their earphones. (USB-C is the fallback wired charging choice, in any case.) With wi-fi charging, the comfort of simply with the ability to go away the Buds on a platform that retains them completely topped up is to not be underestimated. It makes their 13 complete hours of battery life really feel like extra since you’ll hardly ever come near draining each the earphones and the case.

Additionally price noting concerning the Galaxy Buds case: outdoors of the AirPods, that is the primary time the place I’ve unthinkingly put the case for a pair of wi-fi earphones into my denims pocket and headed out the door. Samsung has managed to get underneath the edge at which I think about a case to be a factor I ought to carry in a backpack as a substitute of a pocket, and that’s an achievement in itself.

In equivocating about the place to land with my conclusion on these earbuds, I used to be in the end swayed by their microphone efficiency. They clearly have their professionals and cons, and a terrific mic may have tipped them over into the territory of a very good product with forgivable errors. Alas, the mic is fairly horrible. Samsung invested money and time into this as properly: the corporate put 4 microphones on its buds, with two of them on the inside, designed to select up the consumer’s voice from inside their head. In take a look at recordings I made with the Buds, there was a fuzzy background noise that wasn’t picked up by the distinctly common mic on my MacBook Professional, and my voice was thinned out and rendered with an echo.

The simplicity of my naive childhood dream of true wi-fi earphones belies an enormous raft of technical challenges that the tech business remains to be overcoming. Samsung’s Galaxy Buds are the newest illustration of how arduous it’s to make a tool on this class that’s profitable alongside each parameter, although additionally they present how briskly producers are enhancing.

These are, by far, probably the most compact and unobtrusive true wi-fi earphones I’ve examined, and I commend Samsung’s advances on the miniaturization entrance. The issues I noticed and heard throughout CES this January inform me that 2019 will likely be wealthy on extra true wi-fi buds in the identical measurement and weight and battery-life class as Samsung’s Galaxy Buds. And I think that, as a result of they’ll be designed in a extra common vogue fairly than tailor-made to work greatest with one firm’s {hardware}, they’ll find yourself being higher merchandise ultimately.

Samsung’s Galaxy Buds are in all probability one of the best freebie that an organization has ever bundled with a smartphone preorder, however they fall considerably wanting claiming the title of greatest true wi-fi earbuds. Nice for Samsung house owners, however everybody else ought to look elsewhere.

Vox Media has affiliate partnerships. These don’t affect editorial content material, although Vox Media could earn commissions for merchandise bought by way of affiliate hyperlinks. For extra info, see our ethics coverage.